Wordcraft Community Home Page
Domineering Women

This topic can be found at:
https://wordcraft.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/756604565/m/4481050694

September 30, 2007, 20:45
wordcrafter
Domineering Women
I omitted several terms, from Rip Van Winkle, that were saved for this week's theme, "Domineering Women".

We'll use the first to end Rip's tale. In the two decades he slept, the country has had a revolutionary war, and (perhaps more importantly) his hen-pecking wife has died.So Rip's tale teaches the benefits of getting drunk; and as the author notes in conclusion, "it is a common wish of all henpecked husbands in the neighborhood, when life hangs heavy on their hands, that they might have a quieting draught out of Rip Van Winkle’s flagon."

petticoat government – rule by, or undue predominance or influence of women in domestic, political, or public life

Freud wrote that America's attempt to ban alcoholic beverages was "obviously under the influence of petticoat government." (The Future of an Illusion, in The Freud Reader) But another author gives a different perspective on female rule:
October 01, 2007, 06:52
Caterwauller
quote:
rule by, or undue predominance or influence of women in domestic, political, or public life

Huh. They are implying this is a bad thing?

I'm confused!


*******
"Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.
~Dalai Lama
October 01, 2007, 09:28
zmježd
A little more petticoat government and perhaps countries would not so easily become involved in wars that bring bereavement and tragedy to so many families.

Yeah, Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, Maggie Thatcher, and Benazir Bhutto were all dainty little petticoatians who abhorred war and made peace ... sheesh.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
October 02, 2007, 07:52
wordcrafter
harpy1. a grasping, unscrupulous woman 2. a shrewish woman
[from monsters in Greek myth, half woman and half bird of prey
October 03, 2007, 07:46
wordcrafter
Is today's word entirely negative? See quote.

termagant – an or overbearing, quarrelsome or nagging woman
[an eponym: from the made-up name of a Muslim deity in medieval morality plays. Some say that that name derives from Italian Trivagante ‘thrice-wandering’.]

Fire can destroy – or it can forge steel. A special joy in Margaret Mitchell's Gone With the Wind is to see how the fires of war change Scarlett. Her sisters cannot grow; they remain flighty frivolous southern belles, and are destroyed. But Scarlett, under adversity, becomes a strong, determined woman.

Here is a key scene:
October 03, 2007, 08:09
Robert Arvanitis
Whether a word is negative or positive depends upon the conjugation, viz.:

"I'm resolute, you're stubborn, he's pigheaded."

Or:

"Horses sweat, men perspire, women glow."


RJA
October 04, 2007, 10:39
wordcrafter
virago – a domineering, violent, or bad-tempered woman.
[Latin, 'heroic- or warrior-woman,' from vir 'man'. Used as the name given by Adam to Eve in the Vulgate (Latin) version of the Bible]
October 05, 2007, 13:09
wordcrafter
Perhaps these term reflect a pervasive contempt for women in older England. One is struck by the casual barbarity women suffered at the hands of their husbands and their male neighbors. Consider the branks (developed in the late 1500s) and the cucking stool (about three centuries older).branks (sometimes brank) – a metal cage for the head, often with a metal bit attached to restrain the tongue, formerly used to punish scolds (also called scold's bridle)

cucking stool – a tool for punishing scolds and others. It was chair (often with a hole like a toilet seat, suitable for that use). The victim was tied and either set out for public ridicule or ducked in a river or pond.
[cuck "to defecate" (may also include urinate), from Old Norse kuka "feces".]
[Also known as a trebucket, but that term has further meanings.]

This message has been edited. Last edited by: wordcrafter,
October 05, 2007, 21:02
Kalleh
quote:
I omitted several terms, from Rip Van Winkle, that were saved for this week's theme, "Domineering Women".
I can't wait for the "Domineering Men" theme!
quote:
Yeah, Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, Maggie Thatcher, and Benazir Bhutto were all dainty little petticoatians who abhorred war and made peace ... sheesh.
Ya know, you got me thinking, z. Surely you are right. Yet, I'd always thought that women leaders would be more peaceful. Perhaps I am wrong. I do think women tend to be less violent and more peaceful (am I nuts?). Given that stance (and surely it could be wrong), maybe the variable is that those who pursue powerful positions, be they men or women, tend to be more aggressive.
October 05, 2007, 23:54
neveu
quote:
I do think women tend to be less violent and more peaceful (am I nuts?).

Barking.
October 06, 2007, 08:13
wordcrafter
Today’s word, a rare one, is an eponym. It is the name of Socrates’ wife, who is traditionally described as shrewish and scolding. One story is that she became so angry with her husband that she threw a bucket of washing water on him. Socrates commented philosophically, "After thunder comes rain."

Xanthippe or Xantippe – an ill-tempered woman
October 06, 2007, 13:26
Robert Arvanitis
Perhaps being named "yellow horse" (xanthi + hippo) might take its toll on one's good nature.


RJA
October 06, 2007, 20:19
Kalleh
quote:
Xanthippe

I am familiar with xanthosis, which means a yellow discoloration beneath the skin.

How is Xanthippe pronounced? I like it! And I am surely a Xanthippe tonight, with the Cubs losing and all! Mad
October 07, 2007, 10:38
wordcrafter
harridan – a bossy or belligerent woman (typically an old one) It's unsettling that English has so many objectifying terms for "a woman". If you doubt that it does, see here.
October 07, 2007, 20:59
Kalleh
Yes, I think we've discussed this in other threads here on Wordcraft. Any ideas why?
October 08, 2007, 01:07
neveu
English has just as many terms for objectifying men, but they all derive from words for penis: dick, prick, dork, wanker, weiner, tool, schmuck...
Count your blessings.
October 08, 2007, 05:15
wordmatic
I don't think there are nearly as many objectifying terms for men, but we could take a census.

That Eye Weekly piece was excellent. But I thought a banshee was a male warrior of some sort?

As an opinionated, and I like to think, strong woman, I find it frightening to read the violence of the reactions to temperamental women expressed in the earlier texts. Yikes!

We may be more civilized and enlightened these days, but the underlying feelings still remain. Where I work, the women are always complaining among themselves that the men never listen to us and don't threat us respectfully unless we are very deferential--even though the men put on a good show of being non-discriminatory. Often that is not respect; it is patronization. You only have to look at the salary stats we file with the federal government each year to see that the men get 20%- to 30% more respect than the women.

Still, we women are as harsh about other women as the men if the person in question is obnoxious. We have one younger woman who is always making impertinent, inappropriate remarks about others, and we have a few names for her, like shrew. Likewise, the older woman who habitually lectures us at meetings about everything that is wrong and that we are doing wrong, in her opinion. So what is it about our cultures that makes this attitude toward "domineering" women the norm, whereas in other cultures, more primitive ones, women are dominant and men are subordinate? I wonder what words they have for men in such places?

Wordmatic
October 10, 2007, 10:19
goofy
quote:
Originally posted by wordmatic:
But I thought a banshee was a male warrior of some sort?


banshee is from Irish Gaelic bean sídhe "woman of the fairies". bean "woman" is related to queen.
October 10, 2007, 20:43
Kalleh
neveu, I don't think there is any question that there are more insulting words for women than for men. The very word that Wordmatic mentioned, "shrew," is always used for a woman. I looked back on some threads where we've talked about men and women and really didn't find what I wanted, in terms of the differences in numbers of insulting words. However, in our men vs. women thread, look at the difference between the descriptors of "lady" and "gentleman." I had forgotten about that discussion.

quote:
Where I work, the women are always complaining among themselves that the men never listen to us and don't threat us respectfully unless we are very deferential--even though the men put on a good show of being non-discriminatory.
I have always worked in a field where women predominate. I can tell you that there is an advantage to having men to work with, too. I know that I will sound like I am generalizing and like I am biased against women, but sometimes don't you think women can get too petty? I remember once I had wanted a faculty member to be a part of a committee I was chairing, and one of my colleagues said, "Absolultely not! 20 years ago she blah, blah, blah, and I will never work with her again!" The men I've worked with will get angry, we'll have words, and that's that. The women will hold grudges for the rest of their lives.

On the other hand, let's come up with a few more insults for men!
October 10, 2007, 23:05
neveu
quote:
neveu, I don't think there is any question that there are more insulting words for women than for men

Possibly, but I'd like to see numbers rather than mere assertion. In any case, my point was about the quality of the words rather than quantity. Our language seems to make many fine distinctions between difficult women, but difficult men are just assholes, pricks and bastards.
We make fine distinctions for subjects we know and think a lot about.