Wordcraft Community Home Page
Potter Words and Wordplay; later books

This topic can be found at:
https://wordcraft.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/756604565/m/9321056532

August 22, 2005, 19:17
wordcrafter
Potter Words and Wordplay; later books
enervate – to weaken physically, mentally or morally (can also be used as an adjective.
This is a tricky word, as we'll see after the first set of quotesMany folks, Rowling included, mistakenly use enervate to mean energize – the direct opposite. Though the words seem similar, they have entirely different roots. Energize is from Greek energos, active. Enervate is from Latin nervus, sinew; the e- prefix is a negator as in emasculate. Indeed, an old and rare meaning of enervate was emasculate.)

Here are examples of Rowling misusing (and modifying) enervate in her fourth Potter book, plus another misuse by a Hollywood idol.
August 23, 2005, 14:20
neveu
Innervate means the opposite of enervate, at least in biology, and sounds much the same.
August 23, 2005, 19:30
Beth
I don't think enervate (pace the dear Brits) is properly an adjective, either. And as for those folks who not only use it to mean its opposite but spell it with two N's, well...

Beth J
August 23, 2005, 19:57
Kalleh
One can understand the spelling mistake, though, since innervate has 2 ns and enervate has 1.

Enervate also can mean the removal or dissection of a nerve.
August 24, 2005, 08:40
aput
Did Rowling use 'enervate' at all? No example is given. The spell command 'Ennervate', as with all her spells, is a pseudo-Latin form that, quite deliberately I presume, is never real Latin. (At least, offhand I can't think of any of the spells that are real Latin.) It looks like it's formed as en- + nerv- and is therefore quite appropriate for putting something into nerves.
August 24, 2005, 20:17
wordcrafter
pouf – a low stuffed or padded seat or cushion

We see poufs in the fourth and fifth Potter books, where the students have a class in Divination.Bonus word:
witenagemot
– a council of high churchmen and nobility of Anglo-Saxon England, ~700 to 1200 A.D., convened periodically to advise the King
[Old English wita councilor + gemot meeting]

Rowling puns on witenagemot in her fifth book.
August 25, 2005, 06:58
arnie
I would normally spell the word pouffe.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
August 29, 2005, 11:59
wordcrafter
conjunctivitis – inflamation of the eye-membrane (called the conjunctiva) that covers the eyeball and lines the eyelid

Rowling, seeking to educate and instruct her readers, provides practical data should the reader ever encounter a dragon. Harry uses magic to defeat a Hungarian Horntail dragon, and soon after he receives a letter.
August 29, 2005, 19:38
Kalleh
And of course the layman's term for conjunctivitis is pink eye. I can just envision a dragon with conjunctivitis...those great big eyes all inflammed and pinkish and filled with yellowish drainage. Yuk!
August 30, 2005, 21:17
wordcrafter
frisson - a sudden thrill of fear, or other excitement [from French for 'shiver']
replete - filled or well-supplied, esp. with food

Rowling contrasts the two in here fifth book (here somewhat amended for brevity).
September 04, 2005, 22:40
wordcrafter
We resume the word-of-the-day. The "Harry Potter" theme will be a transition to the new theme that will start tomorrow.

umbrage – offence or resentment at a slight or insult
Typically in the phrase take umbrage. Some say 'take umbrage at'; others 'take umbrage with'; still others 'take umbrage to'.The Potter connection is Dolores Umbridge, a major character in the fifth Potter book, who comes Hogwarts School from the Ministry of Magic. Her name would be appropriate if she were easily offended. But she is not: she is a simpering, controlling woman of sugary voice, who treats the students "as though they were five years old".

Why then does Rowling give her that name? The answer will come tomorrow, as we start our new theme.
September 05, 2005, 20:54
Beth
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kalleh:
One can understand the spelling mistake, though...QUOTE]

Dear me, Kalleh, I'm going to have to meet your husband in a bookstore again and have a word with him. One doesn't "understand" spelling mistakes; one brings out the troops and the firing squads. For the proper frame of reference, reread the intro to Eats, Shoots, and Leaves. The section on militant action by the Apostrophe Protection Society is most instructive.
Smile
Beth J

Remember: The youth of tomorrow depend upon you. The youth of today are already hopeless.
September 05, 2005, 20:59
Beth
quote:
Originally posted by wordcrafter:
Typically in the phrase take umbrage. Some say 'take umbrage at'; others 'take umbrage with'; still others 'take umbrage to'.[LIST]


Has this been checked in the OED? I think I shall have a look. I cannot remember any great author ever using it in any other combination than UMBRAGE AT. TO might just be acceptable, but WITH is absolutely out of the question; I am sure of that.

Thanks for relieving us of Harry Potter; I have not read a word of it, wonder why otherwise smart people do, and have been waiting with bated breath for the discussion of this (semi-literate) outpouring for the masses to end.

Beth J
September 05, 2005, 21:09
Beth
quote:
Originally posted by Beth:
quote:
Originally posted by wordcrafter:
Typically in the phrase take umbrage. Some say 'take umbrage at'; others 'take umbrage with'; still others 'take umbrage to'.[LIST]


Has this been checked in the OED? I think I shall have a look. I cannot remember any great author ever using it in any other combination than UMBRAGE AT. TO might just be acceptable, but WITH is absolutely out of the question; I am sure of that.


Just did check it in OED: found out three things:
(1) It's quite a modern usage. Milton wouldn't have said it in this way.
(2) One can either TAKE UMBRAGE AT (if you're the one who's mad)... or
(3) GIVE UMBRAGE TO (if you've made someone mad).

I have never heard anyone say the latter, but it sounds right to my ear. No other prepositions are mentioned. Creativity in prepositions, as I tell students frequently, is not a virture.

Beth J
September 05, 2005, 21:19
Beth
Originally posted by wordcrafter:
quote:
Bonus word: witenagemot – a council of high churchmen and nobility of Anglo-Saxon England, ~700 to 1200 A.D., convened periodically to advise the King
[Old English wita councilor + gemot meeting]


It's actually from witan as the first part of the word, that having been something like, in a very misunderstood way, the national council of advisers to the king in Anglo Saxon times. You can verify that in the OED. English historical mythology has great fun with this idea, making it out that the wit, scholars shorthand for it, was the mother of all Parliaments and of liberalism itself.

A lot can rest on etymology - history, politics, belief systems, worldviews... cold wars, hot wars. (Thou happenest to have touched my research field, so I have a tendency to ramble. I will now shut up.)

Beth J