Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Word of the year Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted
Political correctness enshrined! ADS makes singular 'they', gender-neutral pronoun, the word of the year.
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Interesting that you saw it that way. My reaction was more about the plural word being made singular. I'll have to get used to that.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
I'm puzzled as to why a word used in a context that its been used in for hundreds of years should be considered political correctness.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9421 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Me, too, Bob. Nice link, goofy. I've not used it that way before, but perhaps I'll start.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Oy they!
 
Posts: 6168 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kalleh:
Me, too, Bob. Nice link, goofy. I've not used it that way before, but perhaps I'll start.


You've never said something like "everyone knows themselves"?
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
You know, Goofy, I reread my own post before seeing your post above and thought, "What did I mean?" Of course I've used it that way. I confess, I don't know what I meant. Perhaps it was just too late.

The part I don't like about some of these articles is that they assume the singular "they" was chosen as the word of the year to be politically correct. I think instead it was chosen because more and more people were using the singular "they" in situations like, "Everyone is laughing because they saw the panda playing in the snow." How else would it be said? I think the media is placing way too much attention on the gender neutral part of it, instead of the grammatical need for it. And, as Bob (and Language Log) says, it has been used that way for hundreds of years anyway. So it really isn't that new.

Sorry about the confusion, goofy. Clearly I confused myself, too. Wink
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted Hide Post
Hey, Kalleh, just catching up on this thread. I should have also linked to the WaPo article that originally caught my attention.

Clearly, 'singular they' has been around a long time to deal with a singular predicate that refers to a group (like 'everyone'). It is also handy for an unspecified singular subject, as in 'Any student will tell you that they...' I was OK with the traditional 'general he', but I can see some rationale for adopting gender-neutral language post-feminism, & 'they' is superior to the self-consciously PC 'he/she' (or worse, arbitrarily choosing 'she' 50% of the time!) Also useful for a specific subject whose identity must be protected (including gender), like a suspect or witness.

Apparently the 'new' idea is to expand its usage to specified, even named singular subjects, regardless of whether the sentence 'sounds right', so as to avoid referring to gender in any way. Just in case THEY use the third rest room!
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
English used to have a pronoun that referred to specified individuals of either gender: a. In the first quote it refers to a woman, in the second it refers to a man:


1387 J. Trevisa MS. Cott. Vesp. D. vii. 29 b, He ran home to uore & prayede hys wyf þat hue wolde helpe for to saue hym,‥bote a dude þe contrary.

"He ran home in advance and prayed that his wife would help save him… but she did the opposite."


c1400 J. Trevisa tr. R. Higden Polychron. (Tiber. D. vii) vi. xxix, in R. Morris & W. W. Skeat Specim. Early Eng. (1884) II. 243 Kynge Edward hadde byhote duc William þat a [a1387 St. John's Cambr. he] scholde be kynge after hym ef he dyede wyþoute chyldern.

"King Edward had promised duke William that he should be king after him if he died without children."
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted Hide Post
That is so interesting, goofy. Is there anywhere I can read more about that "a" online?

I came across this post while hunting. Lots of info on the evolution of pronouns in English.
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I learned about it from Dennis Baron's book on grammar and gender.

http://www.english.illinois.ed...y/debaron/index.html
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12