Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Loving it Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted
On an educators forum I belong to they are having a (so far polite) discussion about the McDonald's slogan

"I'm loving it."

Half of the people there are taking a hard line prescriptive stance that this is in every circumstance ungrammatical. You simply can't - they say - use the progressive form with the verb "love".

Others, the ones who actually have references to back them up, say that you certainly can and everyone does.

My view is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with this structure and I am utterly baffled with why anyone would consider it wrong. When they say you must use always the simple form "I love" I'd say that there is nothing wrong with either form and that they arguably have different meanings.

"I love teaching this class." and "I'm loving teaching this class." for me are both fine and carry slightly different implications.

Thoughts?


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9421 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BobHale:
"I love teaching this class." and "I'm loving teaching this class." for me are both fine and carry slightly different implications.


I agree. I think we can use all stative verbs in the progressive form under certain circumstances, but I'm not exactly sure what those circumstances are.
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
I suspected that you would. Big Grin The "no you can't" people in the other debate are getting quite passionate about insisting that it's always wrong.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9421 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
I don't get it either, Bob. It never would occur to me that it's ungrammatical. Having said that, I'd probably not say, "I'm loving teaching this class," in lieu of, "I love teaching this class."
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Stative verbs in the progressive form are common in Indian English.
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
How many different Englishes are there? Certainly England's English; Scottish and Irish are a bit different, so it's probably not a UK English. That means there is a Scottish and Irish English; a Canadian English; an Australian and New Zealand English; a Chinese English (?); an Indian English; any others?
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
Depends what you mean. Is Boston English different to Los Angeles English? They certainly sound more different to me than "England's English" and "Australian English".

As everyone has their own idiolect there are possibly as many "Englishes" are there are ENglish speakers.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9421 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Well, I suppose you are right. Surely northeastern and southern English are different from the rest of American English. Interestingly, I find northeastern English more similar to England's English than American English.

Given that, I meant countries.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12