Wordcraft Community Home Page
Less and Fewer Again

This topic can be found at:
https://wordcraft.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/741603894/m/7211033755

September 01, 2008, 14:46
BobHale
Less and Fewer Again
I'm sure that at least the UK posters will have already seen this but for those that haven't...

Supermarket chain Tesco, in response to more complaints about "10 items or less" have decided that "10 items or fewer" is too confusing and are changing their signage to read "Up to 10 items". Unfortunately the initially sign painting didn't quite do the job as the "s" had been left off rendering it as "up to 10 item".

The error has now, I understand been rectified.

Meanwhile Languagelog points out, not for the first time, that less has a very long history of usage with count nouns.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
September 01, 2008, 15:19
Kalleh
I see Language Log's point, but for the life of me, I can't figure out why "10 items or fewer" is confusing. People surely know what "fewer" means, don't they?
September 01, 2008, 15:25
BobHale
Yes, but it's really quite uncommon nowadays in speech over here. It sounds rather affected to most people, it's not something the average person in the street says.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
September 01, 2008, 15:38
jerry thomas
"TEN-ITEM LIMIT' might work.
September 01, 2008, 17:39
Valentine
I agree that 10 items or fewer is less commonly heard than 10 items or less, but I agree with Kalleh: is it really confusing?

In the meantime, I'd argue that Up to 10 items means something different. It means 9 items or fewer/less. At a minimum, it is ambiguous.
September 01, 2008, 18:21
<Proofreader>
Perhaps we shouldn't belabor our UK brethren when this story appears in one of their papers.
September 02, 2008, 04:01
arnie
That's The Sun. It may be printed on paper (as well as being online) but by no stretch of the imagination can it be called a newspaper.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
September 02, 2008, 05:40
<Proofreader>
I'd call it an advertising and publicity success for Harrod's.
September 02, 2008, 06:49
arnie
It's not that anyone finds the signs confusing. Prescriptive pedants like Lynne Truss will gleefully pull out their marker pens to "correct" signs containing "less". They are those trying to insist that "fewer" should be used.

The general population, who usually say "Ten items or less", either couldn't give a flying duck or would be puzzled at the strange phrasing of "Ten items or fewer". "Up to ten items" seems a sensible way to compromise.

On another tack, what about the < sign? I've always known it as the "less than" sign. Should it really be called the "fewer than" sign?


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
September 02, 2008, 07:02
<Proofreader>
How do you "pre-drill" a hole?

The other day, while assembling some furniture, I noticed the instructions said, "Put a screw in each of the pre-drilled holes." Perhaps pre isn't vital to that phrase but I knew what they meant. But, on the same day, I was reading an article in Family Handyman magazine which gave as an instruction, "Pre-drill four half-inch holes in the side."

Now, I can drill the holes, but how do I pre-drill them before drilling them? After they're drilled, they become "pre-drilled" but can they be "pre-drilled" before you actually drill them? The bind moggles.