"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 18, 2014, 04:47
Geoff
That's sum conclusion! I had heretofore thought it was 42.
January 18, 2014, 18:35
BobHale
There is of course a serious flaw in what they are doing but apparently the value =1/12 can be assigned to the set by rather more rigorous mathematics.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 18, 2014, 19:34
<Proofreader>
As a non-mathematician, I thought the figure they arrived at was an average.
January 18, 2014, 20:05
BobHale
It wasn't anything... you can't perform arithmetic or algebraic functions on diverging series. It's as simple as that. The operations are undefined. It's still a cute trick though.This message has been edited. Last edited by: BobHale, January 18, 2014 20:35
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 19, 2014, 05:44
<Proofreader>
I'll take your word for it.
January 19, 2014, 21:41
Kalleh
What was the serious flaw?
January 20, 2014, 02:06
BobHale
It was. The serious flaw is that you just aren't allowed to do those operations on that kind of object. It makes as much mathematical sense as saying an apple plus an orange equals a banana.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 20, 2014, 03:12
tinman
I didn't understand it at all. Infinity is not a real number, but rather a concept meaning limitless. Infinity has no beginning and no end, so I don't see how 1+2+3+4+5+6...∞ can be given a value. From what I recall, 1+2+3+4+5+6...n =(n+1)(n/2) = n(n+1)/2 = (n^2+n)/2, where n is a real number. But when n=∞ the formula doesn't work. I'm lost.
January 20, 2014, 03:37
BobHale
Because you don't understand series.
1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16...
is also an infinite series, the terms go on forever but the limit of the series is 2. You go on adding terms forever getting closer and closer to 2.
On this kind of series it's legitimate to say that the sum from 0 to infinity is 2. You can perform matheematical operations on this type of series (converging)
The square roots of negative numbers are also "meaningless" in the sense that infinity is but without them whole swathes of mathematics can't work. Don't make the mistake of thinking that mathematics starts and ends with arithmetic.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
Don't make the mistake of thinking that mathematics starts and ends with arithmetic.
Bob, can you explain that?
Nice link, goofy.
January 23, 2014, 00:37
BobHale
arithmetic = add subtract multiply or divide real numbers
other branches of mathematics include
complex numbers geometry - Euclidean and non-Euclidean calculus - differential and integral algebra set theory number theory topology probability statistics chaos theory game theory trigonometry
and so on and so forth... arithmetic is (usually) just adding stuff up.This message has been edited. Last edited by: BobHale, January 23, 2014 02:48
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 23, 2014, 16:37
<Proofreader>
quote:
and so on and so forth... arithmetic is (usually) just adding stuff up.
And the rest is just making things up?
January 23, 2014, 21:19
Kalleh
I thought so, but I wanted to be sure. In that link that goofy provided, many of the comments were about arithmetic.
January 24, 2014, 00:34
BobHale
Most of the "proof" in the video is simple arithmetic but that's exactly the problem - you can't do arithmetic on diverging series. It doesn't work.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
January 24, 2014, 21:04
Kalleh
Interesting, when I looked up mathematics compared to arithmetic, I found that the mathematical sciences used to include geometry, astronomy and optics.