Wordcraft Community Home Page
Pinker's latest
September 26, 2007, 20:18
<Asa Lovejoy>Pinker's latest
http://www.powells.com/review/2007_09_24.html?utm_source=review-a-dayWhich leads me to question whether one might have an insight - a cognitive leap - apart from language. I think one might, since some animals problem solve. What say you smart critters?
September 27, 2007, 08:36
dalehilemanI lay no particular claim to smarts, but it seems to me we solve many everyday problems in our mind's eye without accessing words
September 27, 2007, 10:28
goofyI have read that Einstein said that he was able to think without language, and found it useful. But I have no references.
September 27, 2007, 18:08
SeanahanI bought this book last week and am slowly working through it. Pinker crams so much information into a short period that I find myself reading a chapter or so a night, so I can digest it all. I'll post more when I've finished.
September 27, 2007, 22:40
KallehThe book sounds very interesting and quite appropriate for Wordcraft. We would appreciate your impressions, Sean. Asa, have you read it?
September 28, 2007, 02:34
BobHaleI agree it sounds interesting. I might well see if I can get a copy.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
September 28, 2007, 04:39
<Asa Lovejoy>I've not read it, since I only learned about it through the review I posted. Give me some time! The review did prompt my question, however. I'm unsure regarding the nature of thought versus the nature of insight.
September 28, 2007, 06:44
bethree5Colin McGinn's critique of Pinker (in part) says
quote:
It just doesn't seem true that everything nonphysical that we think about is metaphorical; for example, our legal concepts such as "rights" are surely not all mere metaphors, introduced on the shoulders of the concepts of intuitive physics.
I like very much Pinker's theory that language is like a grid built on just a few innate concepts which are, in essence: space, time, motion, substance. But I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the
"Are we hard-wired for religion?" talk is about.
September 28, 2007, 07:08
arnieMt newspaper carried a favourable review of
The Stuff of Thought today. The reviewer said that she read it over a period of several evenings just before going to sleep; the sheer amount of information meant that she had to give up trying to read it in one or two sessions.
Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
September 28, 2007, 07:18
goofyDouglas Hofstadter has an interesting
review .
September 28, 2007, 07:23
<Asa Lovejoy>quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the
Your link reminds me of Jung's idea of the collective unconscious.
September 28, 2007, 07:48
zmježd Douglas Hofstadter has an interesting review.I liked the review. I'll have to take a look at the book in question.
—Ceci n'est pas un seing.
September 30, 2007, 07:36
CaterwaullerPhew! Looks like too academic of a read for me. Sounds like interesting ideas, though. Enjoy your new book!
*******
"Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.
~Dalai Lama
October 05, 2007, 18:39
bethree5quote:
Originally posted by goofy:
Douglas Hofstadter has an interesting
review .
Just catching up, Goofy (>pant,pant<

-- enjoyed the link very much. Nice thorough thought-provoking review.
October 05, 2007, 19:02
bethree5quote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the
Your link reminds me of Jung's idea of the collective unconscious.
Finally catching up on posts, Asa-- I was a lousy psych student in college, so I had to read Wiki on this. Right you are-- nothing new under the sun, is there? I was a hippie/ New-Ager, & came to the same concept via Jane Roberts' Seth books-- "cellular memory" (!)
October 05, 2007, 20:29
<Asa Lovejoy>So, old hippie, have you seen the movie, "What The (Bleep) Do We Know?"
October 09, 2007, 07:29
goofyquote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
So, old hippie, have you seen the movie, "What The (Bleep) Do We Know?"
Read this
review before you see it:
quote:
Take home lesson: I can't emphasize enough how important it is that you not watch this movie.
October 09, 2007, 19:27
<Asa Lovejoy>Awwww, yeah, but it's such fun!

Besides, much of it was shot in my neighborhood!
October 09, 2007, 20:37
goofyquote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
Awwww, yeah, but it's such fun!

Besides, much of it was shot in my neighborhood!
Really? Cool. I haven't seen it, but I'm sort of curious despite the warnings. At least it'll be entertaining.
October 13, 2007, 11:32
bethree5Asa, what neighborhood was that, Jupiter? har har, goofy, the review is a riot. my favorite line: "Hey, at least I haven't heard any chiropractors talking about quantum mechanics for more than ten minutes. I suppose that's the best I can hope for." (huh?)
I think on this cool autumn weekend, I'd rather curl up at home & watch another excellent movie,
Plan 9 from Outer SpaceOctober 13, 2007, 12:05
BobHalequote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
Plan 9 from Outer Space
Widely considered to be the worst movie ever made. Personally I think both
Santa Claus Conquers The Martians and
Night of the Lepus with its killer bunny rabbits, give it a good run for its money.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
October 14, 2007, 19:50
goofyAt least Santa Claus Conquers The Martians is entertaining. I'd vote for
Attack of the the Eye Creatures or
Sidehackers because not only do they make no sense, they're boring. I might include
Manos: Hands of Fate, but I can't be sure whether it would have been entertaining without Joel and the bots.
October 17, 2007, 20:03
<Asa Lovejoy>quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
Asa, what neighborhood was that, Jupiter?
Adhara, actually
October 18, 2007, 10:02
arniequote:
Adhara, actually
Is that one of Jupiter's moons?

Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
October 18, 2007, 19:08
<Asa Lovejoy>quote:
Originally posted by arnie:
quote:
Adhara, actually
Is that one of Jupiter's moons?
http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/adhara.html
October 19, 2007, 18:10
zmježdA friend sent me
a link to a video of Pinker giving a talk at Google. It's over an hour long, but well worth a look-see. How cool!
—Ceci n'est pas un seing.