Wordcraft Community Home Page
Pinker's latest

This topic can be found at:
https://wordcraft.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/932607094/m/1541021594

September 26, 2007, 20:18
<Asa Lovejoy>
Pinker's latest
http://www.powells.com/review/2007_09_24.html?utm_source=review-a-day

Which leads me to question whether one might have an insight - a cognitive leap - apart from language. I think one might, since some animals problem solve. What say you smart critters?
September 27, 2007, 08:36
dalehileman
I lay no particular claim to smarts, but it seems to me we solve many everyday problems in our mind's eye without accessing words
September 27, 2007, 10:28
goofy
I have read that Einstein said that he was able to think without language, and found it useful. But I have no references.
September 27, 2007, 18:08
Seanahan
I bought this book last week and am slowly working through it. Pinker crams so much information into a short period that I find myself reading a chapter or so a night, so I can digest it all. I'll post more when I've finished.
September 27, 2007, 22:40
Kalleh
The book sounds very interesting and quite appropriate for Wordcraft. We would appreciate your impressions, Sean. Asa, have you read it?
September 28, 2007, 02:34
BobHale
I agree it sounds interesting. I might well see if I can get a copy.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
September 28, 2007, 04:39
<Asa Lovejoy>
I've not read it, since I only learned about it through the review I posted. Give me some time! The review did prompt my question, however. I'm unsure regarding the nature of thought versus the nature of insight.
September 28, 2007, 06:44
bethree5
Colin McGinn's critique of Pinker (in part) says
quote:
It just doesn't seem true that everything nonphysical that we think about is metaphorical; for example, our legal concepts such as "rights" are surely not all mere metaphors, introduced on the shoulders of the concepts of intuitive physics.


I like very much Pinker's theory that language is like a grid built on just a few innate concepts which are, in essence: space, time, motion, substance. But I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the
"Are we hard-wired for religion?" talk is about.
September 28, 2007, 07:08
arnie
Mt newspaper carried a favourable review of The Stuff of Thought today. The reviewer said that she read it over a period of several evenings just before going to sleep; the sheer amount of information meant that she had to give up trying to read it in one or two sessions.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
September 28, 2007, 07:18
goofy
Douglas Hofstadter has an interesting review .
September 28, 2007, 07:23
<Asa Lovejoy>
quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:

I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the

Your link reminds me of Jung's idea of the collective unconscious.
September 28, 2007, 07:48
zmježd
Douglas Hofstadter has an interesting review.

I liked the review. I'll have to take a look at the book in question.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
September 30, 2007, 07:36
Caterwauller
Phew! Looks like too academic of a read for me. Sounds like interesting ideas, though. Enjoy your new book!


*******
"Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.
~Dalai Lama
October 05, 2007, 18:39
bethree5
quote:
Originally posted by goofy:
Douglas Hofstadter has an interesting review .


Just catching up, Goofy (>pant,pant<Wink-- enjoyed the link very much. Nice thorough thought-provoking review.
October 05, 2007, 19:02
bethree5
quote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:

I think McGinn has a good point, and that there are one or two "metaphysical" concepts wired in as well. I believe that's what all the

Your link reminds me of Jung's idea of the collective unconscious.


Finally catching up on posts, Asa-- I was a lousy psych student in college, so I had to read Wiki on this. Right you are-- nothing new under the sun, is there? I was a hippie/ New-Ager, & came to the same concept via Jane Roberts' Seth books-- "cellular memory" (!)
October 05, 2007, 20:29
<Asa Lovejoy>
So, old hippie, have you seen the movie, "What The (Bleep) Do We Know?"
October 09, 2007, 07:29
goofy
quote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
So, old hippie, have you seen the movie, "What The (Bleep) Do We Know?"


Read this review before you see it:
quote:
Take home lesson: I can't emphasize enough how important it is that you not watch this movie.

October 09, 2007, 19:27
<Asa Lovejoy>
Awwww, yeah, but it's such fun! Big Grin Besides, much of it was shot in my neighborhood!
October 09, 2007, 20:37
goofy
quote:
Originally posted by Asa Lovejoy:
Awwww, yeah, but it's such fun! Big Grin Besides, much of it was shot in my neighborhood!


Really? Cool. I haven't seen it, but I'm sort of curious despite the warnings. At least it'll be entertaining.
October 13, 2007, 11:32
bethree5
Asa, what neighborhood was that, Jupiter? har har, goofy, the review is a riot. my favorite line: "Hey, at least I haven't heard any chiropractors talking about quantum mechanics for more than ten minutes. I suppose that's the best I can hope for." (huh?)

I think on this cool autumn weekend, I'd rather curl up at home & watch another excellent movie, Plan 9 from Outer Space
October 13, 2007, 12:05
BobHale
quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
Plan 9 from Outer Space

Widely considered to be the worst movie ever made. Personally I think both Santa Claus Conquers The Martians and Night of the Lepus with its killer bunny rabbits, give it a good run for its money.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
October 14, 2007, 19:50
goofy
At least Santa Claus Conquers The Martians is entertaining. I'd vote for Attack of the the Eye Creatures or Sidehackers because not only do they make no sense, they're boring. I might include Manos: Hands of Fate, but I can't be sure whether it would have been entertaining without Joel and the bots.
October 17, 2007, 20:03
<Asa Lovejoy>
quote:
Originally posted by bethree5:
Asa, what neighborhood was that, Jupiter?


Adhara, actually
October 18, 2007, 10:02
arnie
quote:
Adhara, actually

Is that one of Jupiter's moons? Confused


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
October 18, 2007, 19:08
<Asa Lovejoy>
quote:
Originally posted by arnie:
quote:
Adhara, actually

Is that one of Jupiter's moons? Confused
http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/adhara.html
October 19, 2007, 18:10
zmježd
A friend sent me a link to a video of Pinker giving a talk at Google. It's over an hour long, but well worth a look-see. How cool!


Ceci n'est pas un seing.