It was interesting to me that my husband thought this of little note. As a musician whose strongest suits are rhythm and pitch, he thought it obvious that any blurb of human speech would have intonation, & that making a repeat loop would introduce rhythm-- voila-- music.
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!
I passed it by two musician / composer friends of mine, and they thought it interesting, although one said: " i've heard repeated speech before and haven't noticed it, so it must be this particular recording - yes? i wonder if it is because of the quality of her voice - which is a little singerly to begin with i think - although it's hard to be sure after you've experienced the illusion - and also because the tune is a very recognizable and hummable simple tonal tune, with a regular 4/4 beat."
I think what surprised me the most was that all 11 subjects (only a couple of whom had any musical training) mimicked her intonation so perfectly that you could play their recoding together and they were singing at precisely the same pitch like a well-trained choir.
There was another interesting bit on the radio interview. To demonstrate some of her research into pitch-based languages, she played a recording of one subject saying the same word over and over-- they were segments clipped out of various spontaneous conversations with various people over a period of weeks. Every time she hit the identical pitch.
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!