Wordcraft Home Page    Wordcraft Community Home Page    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wordplay    Hong Kong poll, very late and very sparse
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Hong Kong poll, very late and very sparse Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted
Well, it has been a long time hasn't it. Sorry for that but circumstances haven't been (and still aren't) ideal.

Still, here's the list of Hong Kong limericks. There were only four of them anyway.

1. When all that can go wrong has gone wrong
In China, they'll send you to Hong Kong
To renew your visa
But that's just a teaser,
Their real aim's to give you your swansong.

2. I wanted to make the big gong dong
On top of a church there in Hong Kong.
I climbed to the top,
But then I went plop -
This limerick will serve as my swan song.

3. A Caucasian pair up in Hong Kong
Birthed a boy. He said, "Something is wrong.
While the boy's a delight,
He seems yellow first sight.
And two whites simply don't make a Wong."

4. There once was a gentleman from Hong Kong
Who had, it’s reputed, a quite long dong
On becoming a Buddhist monk
He’d endeavor to hide his junk
At calls to prayer signaled by the gong-bong

Question:
Choose your favourite.

Choices:
1
2
3
4

 


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9423 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Two whites don't make a Wong

Haha I got to remember that
 
Posts: 244 | Location: ColoradoReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
There were so many in the thread - what happened? When else have we only had four? Too bad.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
Didn't Geoff withdraw his entry/entries? That accounts for at least one missing.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
At the moment we have a four way tie with only four choices


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9423 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Greg S
posted Hide Post
Sorry to be Mr Grumpy-Pants, but how does Limerick 4 get a vote when it is not a limerick. Lines 1, 2 & 5 should have 8 or 9 syllables at most, but each one has 10. I could live that if it wasn't for the fact that each of Lines 3 & 4, which should have 5 or 6 syllables at most, has 8 which makes it impossible to read this in any way, shape or form to make it sound like a limerick. The rhythm is actually just as important as the rhymes for a limerick, but rhymes that serve no other purpose than to meet the technical requirement of having one, like "junk" just don't cut the mustard.

Even without looking for a better Line 4 rhyme, it could easily have been turned into a real limerick with just a little bit of work:

There once was a fellow from Hong Kong
Who had, it’s reputed, a long dong
On becoming a monk
He could not hide his junk
At prayer-calls signalled by the gong-bong.


I hope I haven't offended anyone. I know this isn't OEDILF, but if nobody tells the author and its voter what a limerick actually is, how will they know, for future games.


Regards Greg
 
Posts: 991 | Location: Melbourne AustraliaReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
Sorry, Greg, but your L5 doesn't scan.

At his prayers, punctuated by gong bong

Is one possible fix.

As to someone voting for the original, to each his own. There's no accounting for taste and if everyone liked the same things, there would be no contest.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
All of these - in all the threads - could benefit from workshopping. The "perfect" ones are over there on OEDILF. Wordcraft? We have fun with these. Sometimes I select one that's just damn funny - or has fun rhymes - or just scans so smoothly (this happens very rarely here, for me). But because we are trying to have fun and often write these quickly without 10 people critically analyzing each letter, it is likely none of ours would be winners in the Washington Post's Style Invitational. So what? That's not our style here - we are trying to have fun.

And I so wish Geoff would return. Heck, rules are to be broken anyway.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
There is currently a leader so this is the last call for votes


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9423 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Stanley
posted Hide Post
To be honest, while I see what you mean Greg, I can read the fourth limerick in such a way that it scans. It is maybe less traditional, and maybe sometimes you have to stress odd syllables, but I think it more or less works like this:

There once was a gentleman from Hong Kong
Who had, it’s reputed, a quite long dong
On becoming a Buddhist monk
He’d endeavor to hide his junk
At calls to prayer signaled by the gong-bong

The thing with limericks is that they're more about the stressed parts than all the syllables together, I think. While many are traditionally

A B C D E F G H

you can also add in, for example, an extra unstressed syllable on the end, or one at the beginning, or both:

A B C D E F G H I
A B C D E F G H I
A B C D E F G H I J

In some places there are more than two unstressed syllables between the stressed ones (especailly in lines 3 and 4) and I think that's more of the problem, although since English is a (largely) stress-timed language you can get away with it if you say it quickly enough for it to fit in the rhythm.

I know what you mean, maybe overall it's not the best limerick scansion-wise, but I don't think it's dreadful and, as Kalleh says, it's good enough for a bit of fun! Smile

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Stanley,


------------------------
If your rhubarb is forwards, bend it backwards.
 
Posts: 98 | Location: Reading, UKReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
quote:
it's good enough for a bit of fun!

Exactly. I stopped contributing to OEDILF early on because of the deadly serious way people conducted workshops.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
I dropped out of OEDILF recently because they insisted I cap words which I intentionally did not want capped. They claimed the author had final say on limericks but that is no longer the case there.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
For whatever it's worth, I had never written a limerick or any poetry until I came to this site. I appreciate constructive criticism. I struggled with the syllables in limerick no. 4, but I liked that lines 1,2, & 5 rhymed both Hong and Kong in the last two words. I don't think any others did that (except one with "swan song" came close). I didn't vote for no. 4, however. Number 3 made me laugh.

I more often go for the best joke that seems to work. I think a limerick is a joke that has a rhyming pattern. The best mixture of both qualities is good, but humor seems more subjective. Some people might just put more weight on the humor than on the pattern.

(reworking no. 4 so that it ended with "long-dong-gong-bong" in the last line would have been great)
 
Posts: 244 | Location: ColoradoReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
quote:
For whatever it's worth, I had never written a limerick or any poetry until I came to this site.

I had written a few limericks prior to arriving here and thought I had the game in the bag. Several weeks ago, I went back to the beginning of the game and counted all the submissions. While doing this, I had the opportunity to read the submissions which at the time I thought were gems, but now realize were poorly-written. Since then I've posted 1100 at OEDILF, written several hundred more during workshops there, and have many hundred here. And I find I am still learning and still making mistakes which are painfully obvious to others and invisible to my "trained" eye. I don't mind being told my deficiencies since finding my errors will make the next much better, or so I'm told.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
quote:
I stopped contributing to OEDILF early on because of the deadly serious way people conducted workshops.
Me too.

1100, Proof? Wow! I'd pull a limerick that they insisted should be one way, and I wanted another way.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
look...someone's ahead. time to call a winner?

Proofreader, that sucks. Your limericks seem flawless to a greenhorn like me. But then, I probably don't have the experience to make that judgement. And Kalleh, it seemed like you always commented on how great OEDILF was, that must be disappointing that they have gone the direction to push you two away. (For me, I just kept changing mine until they finally quit. But that was a real workshop for me and my only entry, and I learned from it.)
 
Posts: 244 | Location: ColoradoReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted Hide Post
So number 3 is the winner and number 3 was proofreader.

Others were provided by bethree5 (number 4), Greg S (1) and Kalleh (2)


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9423 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted Hide Post
OK Greg thanks for the work-shopping. This is a bit better, tho' I don't know whether non-yoga people make sense of 'in lotus':

There once was a young man from Hong Kong
Who had, it was said. quite a long dong
When he became a monk
He learned to hide his junk
In lotus, when he heard the gong bong
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
I think I Would say it this way:
quote:
There once was a man from Hong Kong
Who had, it was said. a long dong
On becoming a monk
He would hide jutting junk
In lotus, on hearing the gong bong

Other thoughts may vary.

I am contemplating a new limerick site, to be announced shortly.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted Hide Post
Big Grin like the alliteration in l4
also on hearing smoother
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Greg S
posted Hide Post
Since we're all workshopping your limerick B35, here's my suggestion:

A Buddhist who hailed from Hong Kong
Had hidden that he had a long dong,
But his secret was sunk
On becoming a monk
In lotus, on hearing the gong bong.


Regards Greg
 
Posts: 991 | Location: Melbourne AustraliaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
quote:
I am contemplating a new limerick site, to be announced shortly.
Count me in! Smile
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Wordcraft Home Page    Wordcraft Community Home Page    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wordplay    Hong Kong poll, very late and very sparse

Copyright © 2002-12