Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Let me see if I remember how to do this. Here are the eight limericks we've collected for Chester, and not a bad collection at all. Vote away. | ||
|
Member |
I'm glad I decided not to submit my other limerick - there seems to be rather a lot of undressing going on generally! Difficult choice but I've made my pick. | |||
|
Member |
I'll vote today - but tomorrow I'll be off the Canada where I may - or may not be able to get onto this site. Richard English | |||
|
<Proofreader> |
just to put this on top | ||
Member |
I've voted...but I am not happy with the results! | |||
|
Member |
Sorry to ruin it for everybody who thought they were still an outside chance to win (myself included), but I couldn't go past "Polly Esther". Regards Greg | |||
|
Member |
Voted now. Why are you unhappy. K? "No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson. | |||
|
Member |
"Happy" probably isn't the best word. "Surprised" is more like it, but then I realize I shouldn't be. We all have different tastes in limericks, and I should remember that. | |||
|
Member |
Since Greg "outed" a limerick above, I will do the same. I don't want people to think I was talking about my "voteless" limerick and therefore had sour grapes. Not the case at all! I wouldn't have voted for it myself; not one of my best. | |||
|
Member |
Hardly "outed" - I have only revealed that it's not mine. I only mentioned it because my vote virtually killed off the game. Regards Greg | |||
|
Member |
Perhaps it was the wrong word...however, when you mention a limerick that you voted for (or one that hasn't received any votes, etc.), clearly it puts those limericks in another category. Maybe someone who hasn't voted, for example, sees someone complaining about not getting a vote (me?), so they make a "charity" selection. Alternatively, maybe someone wouldn't have been quite as enthralled with "Polly Esther" if it hadn't been pointed out. However, it seems that most votes are in now, so no matter. | |||
|
Member |
8 is the most number of Votes I can remember being cast since I've been playing the game. When I cast my vote, the 7th at that point, it gave one limerick 3 votes, and a bunch of others had 1. It would have required 2 more voters both to vote for the same limerick, being one of those with 1 vote, to even force a tie, which would then come down to Mike's casting vote. As it turned out the 8th voter, Bob, voted for another one of those yet to receive a vote. The contest was very clearly all over, save for Mike making it official as soon as I cast my vote, and I wanted to apologise for ruining the contest. There is no way my comment could have had any impact whatsoever. Regards Greg | |||
|
Member |
Oh, my. I didn't think I said you "ruined" the contest. Of course that's not the case! I didn't mean that, and I am sorry if it came across that way. You are correct; we had our normal number of voters already, and your comment didn't make a difference, in this game. | |||
|
Member |
No - you didn't say nor imply that. I said I "ruined" the contest, because the contest was over as soon as I cast my vote. Regards Greg | |||
|
Member |
Sorry for the delay. Here are the results, as determined by the international jury: 1 Proofreader’s first effort gained my vote. I was torn between this and the eventual winner, but chose this because I thought it deserved a vote. I would have preferred who’s to who in L2, but otherwise it scanned well, was funny, and as dirty as a good limerick should be! 2 My first limerick, pushing the boundaries of good taste, gained a vote from some suitably debauched voter. 3 Kalleh’s sweet story of young love didn’t get the vote that it deserved. Kalleh was a little hard on this limerick, I feel. I really liked it. 4 Guy Barry’s clever wordplay took home the bacon, and was a deserving winner. I think this one would have won even if Guy had submitted his second limerick, but who can knock a winning strategy? 5 Another sweet limerick, surprisingly enough submitted by Richard ;-) . Perhaps a lesson in how Leicester should be pronounced? Another to pick up a single vote. 6 Greg’s usual high quality entry could have won on another day, but it was running in a tough field. A well-placed second! 7 My second effort, less distasteful perhaps, also managed to snag a vote. I preferred my first one. 8 Proofreader’s second entry also captured a single admirer. I liked it too. Proof’s were the first two limericks I got, and at the time I was sure one of the two would be a winner, but it seems Chester was a fruitful subject. Lots of good quality limericks, and this is reflected in the even voting. Guy’s was a clear winner though, so it’s over to you, Guy, for the next place name. | |||
|
Member |
Thank you. In fact if my three votes had been split across two limericks one of them would have had at least two, so I'd still have won regardless. However I still believe my strategy was vindicated! When I initially saw two other limericks involving the name "Esther" my heart sank a little, but it was nice to win with a good honest pun (and a clean one as well!).
Thanks and can I say that I had a difficult choice amongst the others - the standard was very high this time. New place name to come shortly... | |||
|
Member |
Somewhat to my sursprise I have managed to log on using someone else's computer and internet access. So hello from the Canadian Rockies! What do you mean by a "sweet" limerick? Not scurrilous enough, maybe Richard English | |||
|
Member |
I think any limerick using the word "pest" qualifies as sweet, but that may simply be a personal prejudice. I don't think any limerick could ever be harmed by being more scurrilous though | |||
|
Member |
By the way Guy, I know I should be thinking about new "Tooting" limericks now, but your very clever "Polly Esther" limerick keeps popping up in my head, and this time with a slightly different twist: Ironically brought up in Chester, Polly was a Double-D breaster. But were they for real? Well after a feel, A few blokes have called Polly, Esther. Regards Greg | |||
|