Wordcraft Home Page    Wordcraft Community Home Page    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Potpourri    the long and the lengthy
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
the long and the lengthy Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of zmježd
posted
quote:
Lengthy. This word is of comparatively recent origin, and, though, it is said to be an Americanism, it is a good deal used in England. The most careful writers, however, both here and elsewhere, prefer the word long: "a long discussion," "a long discourse," etc.


[Alfred Ayres The Verbalist: A Manual Devoted to Brief Discussions of the Right and the Wrong Use of Words, and to Some Other Matters of Interest to Those Who Would Speak and Write with Propriety, New York, 1895.]

quote:
lengthy is an Americanism long established in Britain, sometimes used as a jocular or stylish synonym for long but more commonly and usefully as implying tediousness as well as length.


[H. W. Fowler A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 2nd edition, revised by Sir Ernest Gower, OUP, 1965.]

quote:
lengthy. Throughout the 19th century, many BrE speakers considered this word and ugly Americanism. But it is now standard throughout the English-speaking world. The only restriction is that it should refer to books, talks, or arguments, with the implication of tedium. It shouldn't refer to physical distances, as here: "Women longshoremen sometimes have to drive lengthy [read long] distances to find one [a toilet] or to locate someone with a key." Virginian-Pilot & Ledger Star (Norfolk), 10 Apr. 1997, at 6.


[Bryan A. Gardner A Dictionary of Modern American Usage, OUP, 1998.]

I thought of lengthy, and its curious rise to standardness, when reading elsewhere today of the backformed denominal verb restorate (from, no doubt, restoration), which is similar in motive to orientate (from orientation). Although the latter, orientation is not a valid latin word, but already a strange kind of morphological monster from oriens adj. 'rising' (from orior 'to rise', whose proper past participle is ortus not orientatus.

Anyway, I like its slide from ugly Americanism to standard in the anglophone world. Now that's progress! Another resonance with restorate, contra "why coin a word, when we have a perfectly good one already," i.e., restore, is how lengthy which may have started as a near perfect synonym has subtly changed its meaning over a century of usage or so to fit the genius of the language and its speakers. (Note also, we have restaurate from restauration.)

[Fixed typo.]

This message has been edited. Last edited by: zmježd,


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
 
Posts: 5149 | Location: R'lyehReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of pearce
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zmjezhd:

Zmj, What an excellent exposition. I am inclined with Fowler to restrict lengthy to imply something tedious as well as long.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: pearce,
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Yorkshire, EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of zmježd
posted Hide Post
Ta, Pearce. For me, it's also about tediousness as well as lengthiness.

Here are some gems from the article in Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of American Usage:

quote:
Lengthy started its career as a usage issue in the late 1700s, when British critics began to attack it as an Americanism. The first record of its use is from about a hundred years earlier. Among the 18th-century American writers who used it were Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin.

[...]

[A] British nobleman named Lord Harrowby defended lengthy as early as 1818, finding that it "imported what was tedious as well as long, an idea that no other English word seemed to convey as well." Lengthy became so firmly established in British usage during the 19th century that [Albert] Mathews [in The Dial in 1898] felt safe in concluding that "the controversy may be said long ago to have ended."

As it turns out, Mathew's conclusion was a bit premature. Lengthy has continued to appear sporadically in books on usage (most of them American) throughout the 20th century. [Ambrose] Bierce 1909 thought that it was "no better than breadthy, or thicknessy," but later commentators have been more tolerant.

[...]

The upshot of this lengthy discussion (which you may find either tedious or comprehensive) is that lengthy is a venerable synonym of long which has been used by excellent writers for about three centuries. You need not hesitate to use it yourself.


I like how the British have come to accept it, but the Americans, worried over their pronvincial accents and grammar, have not.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
 
Posts: 5149 | Location: R'lyehReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Wordcraft Home Page    Wordcraft Community Home Page    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Potpourri    the long and the lengthy

Copyright © 2002-12