Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Heard this one? Even when I look up the definition, it doesn't seem to fit the usage. (from yesterday's local paper, interviewing an author ready to depart for her family's summer beach-house)
| ||
|
Member |
If the definitions are accurate then the word's use here is inaccurate. I suspect that the writer saw the word and guessed its meaning as being that of a utility object with certain pointless features. Not a bad guess, but wrong. It reminds me of an article in our local paper where the author was writing about a new car and used the phrase, "...as with all Mercedes vehicles, this model eschews (sic) quality..." - clearly the opposite to what he actually meant. What word he was seeking I can only guess: "issues" might work in a slightly changed construction, but that's the only similar-sounding word I can think of. Richard English | |||
|
Member |
Richard, At a guess, I'd say the word he was looking for is "exudes". Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
Member |
I didn't think of that. And I suppose it's just possible that, had he written something like "exchewds", a spell-checker might have suggested "eschews". Richard English | |||
|
Member |
I don't feel that there's enough here to understand the context. The word seems a no-brainer to me; we all know what "futile" means, and it's the noun form. Your interpretation works, Asa, though I am not sure what he means by "how" then. | |||
|