Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Dying languages? An interesting article, titled --- -. . -- .- -. .----. ... -... .. -.. - --- ... .- ...- ., discusses the decline of Morse Code. It refers to Morse Code as a "language". I'd always thought Morse Code was an alphabet, not a language. Comments? Excerpts from the article:
"But I have no delusions of grandeur that I can save Morse code from extinction. I'm not Don Quixote. I'm not going to go out and fight windmills." In February, the Federal Communications Commission eliminated the Morse requirements for ham-radio licenses. "It is a sad state of affairs when the U.S. doesn't even attempt to keep the language alive or give an incentive to work on it," says Mr. Adams. | ||
|
Member |
Morse code is pretty much what it says it is: a code. One to one mapping between letters and digits and dots and dashes. —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
In some ways it reminds me of text language. | |||
|
Member |
It's probably common knowledge ... but in formal Morse Code discourse the recipiennt of the message responds with " ._. " which is the letter "R." When the letters were named, to improve accuracy in understanding, the name "Roger" was given to the letter "R." Hence the word "Roger" in spoken radio discourse means "Received." | |||
|
Member |
I agree that Morse code is not a language; if anything it is a kind of Roman alphabet. If it were a language then Morse code messages would be identical regardless of whether they were being sent by an English speaker, a Spanish speaker or a German speaker. Which they clearly are not. Richard English | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |