Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Did it take? Login/Join
 
Member
posted
Consider the use of the expression "take" and "took" in these ways, which you have probably heard before:

"I got a shot for that, but I don't think it took."

"I tried to ingratiate myself with his family, but it didn't take."

Anyone know how this got started and/or whether it's a colloquialism?
 
Posts: 345Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think the expression comes from "take hold".

"I got a shot for that, but I don't think the effect took hold."

The second one is a little trickier, because it is the more idiomatic of the two. One could rewrite it in intermediate form as:

"My attempts to to ingratiate myself in his family didn't take hold."

This is still idiomatic, and it seems it may well have come from:

"I was unable to ingratiate myself in his family, they didn't take hold of me."

This last is quite a bit of a stretch, so this may not be convincing, but my attempts to search various dictionaries left me annoyed with take's polysemy.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Seanahan,
 
Posts: 886 | Location: IllinoisReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Interesting question. It seems to me that you could just switch the sentences:

I got a shot for that, but it didn't take.
Less so for this one:
I don't think my attempts to ingratiate myself in his family took.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
Another possibility is the agricultural metaphor "take root".


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Don't take it too hard ( Smile ) but I thought these were all examples of using the word 'take' in the sense of "becoming affected by"? The classic example of this is to take ill.


Myth Jellies
Cerebroplegia--the cure is within our grasp
 
Posts: 473Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of pearce
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by saranita:
"I got a shot for that, but I don't think it took."

A mixture of slang and garbage. I have no idea what it means.

"I tried to ingratiate myself with his family, but it didn't take."

The meaning here is perceptible, just. But logically, how can ingratiation take? It's simply bad writing or speech.

 
Posts: 424 | Location: Yorkshire, EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
From the American Heritage Dictionary:

quote:

4. To have the intended effect; operate or work: The skin graft took. 5. To gain popularity or favor: The television series, which didn't take, was later canceled.
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
Pearce,

I think "I got a shot for that, but I don't think it took." means "I was given a vaccination (or an immunisation injection) for that but I don't think it worked."


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pearce:
The meaning here is perceptible, just. But logically, how can ingratiation take? It's simply bad writing or speech.


If we're going to apply logic to language, then we're in trouble. Logically, how does one come into possession of home in the sentence "I got home at 5"? Logically, how does music get - as in "Music really gets me"? And so on.
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of pearce
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gooofy:
If we're going to apply logic to language, then we're in trouble. Logically, how does one come into possession of home in the sentence "I got home at 5"? Logically, how does music get - as in "Music really gets me"? And so on.

The application of logic to language means only that the language makes understandable sense to the reader. Colouful metaphors are fine, and "in phrases" have a place and may enrich conversation, but they have to be good, and that of course is a matter for personal judgement.
Without wishing to be pedantic or prissy, I could neither write nor say either of the expressions you mention.
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Yorkshire, EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pearce:
The application of logic to language means only that the language makes understandable sense to the reader. Colouful metaphors are fine, and "in phrases" have a place and may enrich conversation, but they have to be good, and that of course is a matter for personal judgement.
Without wishing to be pedantic or prissy, I could neither write nor say either of the expressions you mention.


And that's fine. My point is simply that you can't apply logic to language consistently. Deciding whether or not it's understandable is different from whether it's logical. If language was logical, why can we say

I break the glass.
The glass breaks easily.

The butcher cuts the meat.
The meat cuts easily.

but not

Jenni adores hand-loomed wool.
*Hand-loomed wool adores easily.
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of zmježd
posted Hide Post
metaphors
quote:
Metaphor has been seen within the Western scientific tradition as purely a linguistic construction. The essential thrust of Lakoff's work has been the argument that metaphors are primarily a conceptual construction, and indeed are central to the development of thought. He says, "Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature." Non-metaphorical thought is for Lakoff only possible when we talk about purely physical reality. For Lakoff the greater the level of abstraction the more layers of metaphor are required to express it. People do not notice these metaphors for various reasons. One reason is that some metaphors become 'dead' and we no longer recognise their origin. Another reason is that we just don't "see" what is "going on".

George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By.

Lakoff has been making the media rounds recently talking about framing. He is one of the founders of the Rockridge Institute, a think tank in Berkeley, California.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
 
Posts: 5148 | Location: R'lyehReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12