Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Awkward phrasing? #2 Login/Join
 
<wordnerd>
posted
Here's the second of two bits that struck me as odd in today's paper:
    The bureaucrat in charge of issuing your firm with a necessary permit demands a backhander not to lose the paperwork.
Does the word with belong?

[And by the way, the term backhander for bribe was a new one to me. You?]
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
You have an issue with "issuing with"? Big Grin I find it awkward as well and would prefer to see something like "...issuing a necessary permit to your firm..."


Myth Jellies
Cerebroplegia--the cure is within our grasp
 
Posts: 473Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
The construction issuing with and backhander are both not uncommon in the UK. Was the author British, by any chance?


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
<wordnerd>
posted
quote: Was the author British, by any chance?

Aha! So he was, and so he is. "Robert Guest ... Mr. Guest is Washington correspondent for the Economist."

PS: I'd mistyped this as correspondint, which i suppose means "a hard-working correspondent." Wink
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12