July 05, 2013, 20:57
KallehWhat say you?
I'd like your opinion on the
sic below:
quote:
"Why 2013 is shaping up to be the worst year for woman's (sic) health in modern history."
Once I hear from you, I'll let you know my opinion.
July 06, 2013, 02:12
arnieWhich woman? I suppose it would be better as "
women's health". Or is it intended as some sort of abstract woman? Perhaps a capital W might work if that's what is meant.
July 06, 2013, 21:48
KallehYes, I am sure that's why the
sic. It was by a columnist whom I consider to be smarmy, snarky and less than brilliant. So clearly I am biased. However, my take on it was that the "a" was understood. I realize it's usually "women's health," but I think it could also be "a woman's health."
July 08, 2013, 01:45
arnieWithout full context, it's difficult to say, but I'd suggest it would normally be
women's health. That is, the health of women. If the writer were talking about a particular (unnamed, for some reason) woman I'd agree, Kalleh, but I don't think so. The only other construction is the use of
woman as some sort of archetype (with or without a capital letter as I mentioned earlier), rather like in the feminist anthem by Helen Reddy "I am Woman". In that case no article would be used.
July 09, 2013, 11:57
KallehAh, well, I guess I am just biased then. I dislike the author,
Jonah Goldberg. I wanted to write a response, but I guess I'd be wrong.