Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Am I not? Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted
In another thread CJ said, "Ain't gonna happen", when talking about men becoming ballerinos.

"Ain't" is such a detested word here in the U.S. Did it come from "am I not?" Was it ever considered correct English? Or, has it always been incorrect?
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
Dictionary.com contains a usage note from the AHD which pretty well answers your questions.

There's also a scholarly treatise on the use of ain't at http://www.hfac.uh.edu/English/classes/GU4322/items/aint.html
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
"Ain't gonna happen" is one of those phrases, wrong or right, that has crept into our language. I notice it is the "ain't" that has you upset. Does that mean you accept the "gonna"?
 
Posts: 1412 | Location: Buffalo, NY, United StatesReply With QuoteReport This Post
<wordnerd>
posted
Interesting. By the AHD usage note arnie cites, ain't never achieved the acceptance into standard English that was bestowed upon other contractions. But etymology on-line says that ain't, meaning "am not", "was in proper use until it began to be used as a generic contraction for are not, is not, etc., early 19c., which led to it being banished from correct English."
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
quote:
I notice it is the "ain't" that has you upset. Does that mean you accept the "gonna"?
Oh, no, Morgan, I am not upset at all. I know that phrase has crept into our language. It just made me think about whether ain't was ever completely acceptable.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12