September 09, 2003, 03:58
RosYes, we have no bananas...
Nothing to do with the title - that lyric was just echoing round my head at the time!
What I wanted to ask was about the word "handful". The plural, to be precise. Should it be handfuls or handsful? Likewise armfuls or armsful, etc. etc. ad nauseum...
I like the latter option, handsful, because it seems to me that it makes more sense, but maybe I'm just being deliberately awkward!
Any thoughts?
Ros
September 09, 2003, 08:08
<Asa Lovejoy>Any thoughts?
---------------------
In my case, yes, but they're utterly inane, thus of little value.
I've only seen "handfulls," but if you prefer the other, why not?
September 09, 2003, 09:45
BobHalequote:
plural anomalies
3. Plurals of compound words. These ordinarilly form their plurals logically by attatching the -s to the noun element in them,or, if there is more than one noun, to the significant one. Listeners-in, sons-in-law, heirs presumptive, master mariners, tugs of war, deeds poll.
But many familiar compounds now make their plurals as if they were single words (char-a-bancs, will-o'-the-wisps, four-in-hands)especially if they contain no noun (ne'er-do-wells, forget-me-nots) or are -ful compounds (handfuls, mouthfuls,spoonful;s) or are PHRASAL VERBS used as nouns (take-offs, knock-outs, call-ups)
Fowler
Glaubt es mir - das Geheimnis, um die größte Fruchtbarkeit und den größten Genuß vom Dasein einzuernten, heisst: gefährlich leben.
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Read all about my travels around the world here.Read even more of my travel writing and poems on my weblog.September 09, 2003, 12:17
TadpoleWell, I do wish someone would tell the BBC this. Especially since they have gone to such extreme lengths to learn how to pronounce (or so they say) Bombay and various other names, I cannot fathom why they will not educate their journalists to speak English correctly.
Listening to the news is becoming more of a cringe-making excercise than an instructive occupation.
Sigh......

Tadpole
September 09, 2003, 17:01
C J StrolinB.H., you surprise me. I had always been taught that "handsful" was correct for the same reason "mothers-in-law" was. I've never heard of an exception for "ful" words.
Then again, I've often proudly and publicly stated that I have given many fantastic "feetrub" in my life.