Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Nothing to do with the title - that lyric was just echoing round my head at the time! What I wanted to ask was about the word "handful". The plural, to be precise. Should it be handfuls or handsful? Likewise armfuls or armsful, etc. etc. ad nauseum... I like the latter option, handsful, because it seems to me that it makes more sense, but maybe I'm just being deliberately awkward! Any thoughts? Ros | ||
|
<Asa Lovejoy> |
Any thoughts? --------------------- In my case, yes, but they're utterly inane, thus of little value. I've only seen "handfulls," but if you prefer the other, why not? | ||
Member |
quote: Glaubt es mir - das Geheimnis, um die größte Fruchtbarkeit und den größten Genuß vom Dasein einzuernten, heisst: gefährlich leben. - Friedrich Nietzsche Read all about my travels around the world here. Read even more of my travel writing and poems on my weblog. | |||
|
Member |
Well, I do wish someone would tell the BBC this. Especially since they have gone to such extreme lengths to learn how to pronounce (or so they say) Bombay and various other names, I cannot fathom why they will not educate their journalists to speak English correctly. Listening to the news is becoming more of a cringe-making excercise than an instructive occupation. Sigh...... Tadpole | |||
|
Member |
B.H., you surprise me. I had always been taught that "handsful" was correct for the same reason "mothers-in-law" was. I've never heard of an exception for "ful" words. Then again, I've often proudly and publicly stated that I have given many fantastic "feetrub" in my life. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |