Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
The latest entry (link) in the un-X-able words category: an article in The New Yorker about unusable words. The first word he discusses is fathomless and its near synonym depthless. And for what it's worth, the forum software recognizes fathomless but not depthless. NOTE edited by arnie to mend broken link.This message has been edited. Last edited by: arnie, —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | ||
|
Member |
That's a lovely article and a lovely conceit. That last word, by the way, is probably also an unusable word. Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
Member |
I don't see how pulchritude and puissance fit into the discussion. Or am I too depthless to understand? It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti | |||
|
Member |
The author feels that pulchritude is an ugly word and doesn't convey the essence of its meaning because of that. YMMV - personally, I don't have any issues with it. Similarly, puissance is felt to sound rather too much like "pussy" to convey true virile manly power. Although he doesn't mention it, the word also sounds uncomfortably close to "pissant". Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
Member |
OK, so the author doesn't know Latin or French. That's HIS problem that he can't see the pulchritude or puissance of these words. It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti | |||
|
Member |
Very interesting article, z. I've always loved auto-antonyms. We've talked about them here, and arnie refers us to other places where they've been discussed. His concept of pulchritude and puissance having ugly or "pussy-like" sounds doesn't ring true to me. I like both those words. | |||
|