Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Is this right? Login/Join
 
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted
I am at a conference in Vermont, and four principles of a "Open Spaces" were being discussed. Of one, the speaker said, "I am not sure of the grammar of this one:"

"Whoever comes are the right people."

Or is it "Whoever comes is the right people?"

Either way I think it's wrong.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bethree5
posted Hide Post
Wow that is a tough one, Kalleh!

I think you could go with the firt one-- the one that says what you mean-- because 'who' can be singular or plural.
 
Posts: 2605 | Location: As they say at 101.5FM: Not New York... Not Philadelphia... PROUD TO BE NEW JERSEY!Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
"People" is plural so the first is correct.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
Whoever they are, they seem incredibly horny.

To rephrase, "Those who come, whoever they may be, are the right people."

Even hornier that way.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Proofreader>,
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
Considering the title of this thread, perhaps this belongs here.

Ignoring the political implications, is there really such a thing as a "retroactive retirement"?
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
The reason I don't think the first is right is because isn't "whoever" singular? That is, shouldn't it be "whoever is?"
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Whatever... Big Grin


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Richard English
posted Hide Post
As the statement refers to a possible future event, the verb should not be in the present tense.

And I would leave the word "people" out:

"Whoever comes will be right".

It is implicit in the noun "whoever", which means "whatever person", that it is people that are being referred to. Indeed, if the phrase "whatever person" is used instead of "whoever", then the grammar becomes obvious.


Richard English
 
Posts: 8038 | Location: Partridge Green, West Sussex, UKReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Richard English:
As the statement refers to a possible future event, the verb should not be in the present tense.

And I would leave the word "people" out:

"Whoever comes will be right".


Then why not "whoever will come will be right?"
 
Posts: 2428Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Surely rewording it would make it more readable (with this audience, I hate to say will make it "correct".) However, for a major initiative such as this, you'd think they would have reworded it.

I think "Whoever will come will be right" works much better.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kalleh:
Surely rewording it would make it more readable (with this audience, I hate to say will make it "correct".) However, for a major initiative such as this, you'd think they would have reworded it.

I think "Whoever will come will be right" works much better.


It is unclear to me what is meant by the word "right" in that context. Does it mean that whatever they say will be correct; or does it mean that they are the ones who belong there?

Whoever answers my question will be right. Big Grin
 
Posts: 244 | Location: ColoradoReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
Oh, I do like to be right! Wink

This is a collaborative group of people. They decide on categories, and then people self select. So...I think they mean the people who come to each section are those who belong.

They don't make it very clear, though, do they?
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12