I am at a conference in Vermont, and four principles of a "Open Spaces" were being discussed. Of one, the speaker said, "I am not sure of the grammar of this one:"
As the statement refers to a possible future event, the verb should not be in the present tense.
And I would leave the word "people" out:
"Whoever comes will be right".
It is implicit in the noun "whoever", which means "whatever person", that it is people that are being referred to. Indeed, if the phrase "whatever person" is used instead of "whoever", then the grammar becomes obvious.
Richard English
Posts: 8038 | Location: Partridge Green, West Sussex, UK
Surely rewording it would make it more readable (with this audience, I hate to say will make it "correct".) However, for a major initiative such as this, you'd think they would have reworded it.
I think "Whoever will come will be right" works much better.
Originally posted by Kalleh: Surely rewording it would make it more readable (with this audience, I hate to say will make it "correct".) However, for a major initiative such as this, you'd think they would have reworded it.
I think "Whoever will come will be right" works much better.
It is unclear to me what is meant by the word "right" in that context. Does it mean that whatever they say will be correct; or does it mean that they are the ones who belong there?
This is a collaborative group of people. They decide on categories, and then people self select. So...I think they mean the people who come to each section are those who belong.