Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Today I received the following e-mail from a freind. Is it joking or it's true? *** German lobbies finally accepted English as the official language in the European Union. European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English" . In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter. There will be growingb publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter. In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away. By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru. Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas. ---------------------- Hamdeli az hamzabâni behtar ast To be one in heart is better than to be one in tongue - Rumi (Persian poet) | ||
|
Member |
This is an old, but quite good joke. Richard English | |||
|
Member |
Thanks Richard English. So it's a joke. Personally speaking, I don't like such things to be applied to any form of English (Euro-, British, American, etc.). ---------------------- Hamdeli az hamzabâni behtar ast To be one in heart is better than to be one in tongue - Rumi (Persian poet) | |||
|
Member |
It is a joke, but there have been serious proposals for spelling reform put forward by people at various times. Some have even ben attempted. Some schools did experiment with, for example, Pitman's Initial teaching Alphabet. I have a cousin taught using this system who is unable to spell consistently to this day. George Bernard Shaw was also an advocate for spelling reform. Of course Germany went ahead and did it with a whole set of spelling reforms, the Rechtschreibreform. "No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson. | |||
|
Member |
And, of course, there was Noah Webster. Whilst his intentions were good, his reforms meant that American English was no longer spelt in the same way as the rest of the English-speaking world, with all its concomitant problems. Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
<Asa Lovejoy> |
True, arnie. Around here we think "spelt" is a type of grain! | ||
Member |
I wondered if anyone would notice that. I wanted to work into the post one of the differences! Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|