On several occasions, over the last month, I've heard people on court shows seeking redress for finances they've disbursed to assorted degenerates in their family. Many used a word in a way I would not consider normal.
John says he gave his brother Jim $400. "I borrowed Jim $400 and he didn't pay me back."
Obviously it is Jim who "borrowed" the money, which John "loaned" to him. I would have thought it an error except at least four different people used "borrow" that way on three separate occasions.
It's quite a common confusion. It's certainly a non standard usage but I've heard it many times. I had a colleague who used borrow and lend the wrong way round consistently. I used to drive him as crazy with my replies as he drove me with his usage. Conversations of the form
"Can you borrow me a pencil?" "Certainly, who shall I borrow it from?"
and
"Can I lend your pencil?" "That depends who you want to lend it to."
were frequently exchanged in our corner of the office.
"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
Probably because the Old English verb from which borrow is descended, borgian meant both to borrow and to lend (A-H *bhergh- 'hide, protect' link whence also bury, bargain, Bosworth-Toller link).
This is a common enough linguistic occurrence in the semantics of verbs and nouns of reciprocity in Indo-European and other languages. Cf. Sanskrit gam 'to go', Latin venio 'come', Greek βαινω bainō 'come', English come, etc.
This sort of expression, with many verbs, is fairly common in the South and Southwest of the USA. "That'll learn you a thang or two about regionalisms!"
Originally posted by Kalleh: That's interesting because those words are opposites really. I can't say I've heard "borrow" used to mean "lend." Perhaps it's a regionalism?
I don't hear it often, but I have heard it. Using borrow for lend was one of the usages my high school teachers used to rail against. A guy at work used to say things like "Borry me a dollar" all the time. He was from South Dakota.