Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
I appeal to the good folk of Wordcraft to help me find a better word. Accountants I know are offering a course in the new Excel, offering to help users "manipulate sheets..." Surely there is a better, or at least more tasteful, usage? Accountants must do something other than "manipulate." From Etymological dictionary: "from L. manipulus "handful, sheaf," from manus "hand" (see manual) + root of plere "to fill" (see plenary). Sense of "skillful handling of objects" is first recorded 1826; extended 1828 to "handling of persons" as well as objects. Manipulative is from 1836; manipulate is from 1831." Fascinating that it is cognate to "mandate," "manual," "manciple" and "manner." RJA | ||
|
Member |
"manipulate sheets..." It seems to me that manipulate spreadsheets is pretty well established by now. Why choose a new term and confuse the oldtimers? There's a lot to manipulate or handle: creating, deleting, calculating (with), etc. You could say "use spreadsheets", I suppose, but then you wouldn't be getting your hands dirty by hands-on manipulation ... I'm sure one of the more rigorously minded amongst us will give you better and more serious suggestions. (Just, please, nothing along the liens of how to thumb a drive.) —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
... while we wait, here's another ... handy link. | |||
|
Member |
zmježd makes a good point on usage. It's not that "manipulate" is inherently bad. Rather, it has just been keeping bad company, post-Enron (see below). "On May 20, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule, as directed by Section 303 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, making it unlawful for officers and directors of public companies, and persons acting under their direction, to coerce, manipulate, mislead or fraudulently influence the company’s..." RJA | |||
|
Member |
I think it's just that manipulate has more than one meaning.
| |||
|
Member |
Yep! I wonder, if you applied for a course on how to manipulate spreadsheets expecting goofy's definitions 2b or 3, and instead got taught definition 2a, could you ask for your money back? Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
Member |
Yeah, but ... (reinforcing Robert's point, and somewhat questioning goofey), While it's true that 'manipulate' can properly be used in a neutral or even laudatory sense (or at least, could be in the past), isn't it also true that it in practice it almost always has a negative connotation?This message has been edited. Last edited by: wordnerd, | |||
|
Member |
I was thinking that, too, Wordnerd, but I wonder if perhaps those in accounting and computers actually don't see it as negatively as the rest of us do. That is the problem with multiple definitions, I agree. It also might be a good reason to come up with a different word. Many of us perceive this use of the word negatively, there is no getting around that. | |||
|