Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
There was an interesting article in the Tribune today about locals' pronunciation of Chicago. I suppose I have to admit that I say "Chi-CAW-go." The author of the article, Casey Bukro, calls those who say "Chi-caaaa-go" linguistic carpetbaggers. He/she (?) has some other complaints as well, such as the frequent use of "environment." I hadn't noticed, but I see the point. Similarly, the author dislikes "if you will," and I have to agree. It always seems so contrived. | ||
|
Member |
I've never heard it pronounced "Chi-caaaa-go." I've only heard "Chi-CAW-go." | |||
|
Member |
I've never heard the chi of the first syllable pronounced with a ch[/i /tʃ/ of [i]cheat, but with the sh, /ʃ/, of she. It always seems so contrived. All language is contrived. It's the nature of the beast. —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
Oh, it is pronounced with an "sh," that's right. One does hear "Chi (really "shi")-caaaa-go" here, Tinman. | |||
|
Member |
I can't tell what the difference would be between "aaaa" and "aww" - can you give word-use examples for me, please? I've also heard shi-caw-ga, with the final syllable almost swallowed. ******* "Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions. ~Dalai Lama | |||
|
Member |
Do you pronounce "cot" and "caught" the same? | |||
|
<Proofreader> |
ChiKAHgo heahabouts | ||
Member |
Yes, CW. Goofy has it. "aaaaa" isn't quite "ah," but closer to it than "awwww." I really need to learn that IPA! | |||
|
Member |
Goofy has it. "aaaaa" isn't quite "ah," but closer to it than "awwww." Yes,there's a difference between dialects that maintain the caught-cot distinction and those that do not. —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|