Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
I would think the adjective for leer would be just that, an adjective. Yet they really mean 2 very different things. There is absolutely no sexual insinuation with leery, while there is for leer. Any idea why the adjective isn't similar to the noun or intransitive verb? | ||
|
Member |
Well as a lorry driver we were taught to leer as part of the driving course! I assume the two words have different origins perhaps. Leery to me always suggests a very particular feeling that other word fits so well! | |||
|
Member |
The Online Etymology Dictionary gives: My personal reaction is that their first suggestion is right, and there is no connection with leer. Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. | |||
|
Member |
The online Compact OED suggests that the two words are related. To leer originally meant to look askance or sideways. Not much of a stretch there. To be cautious or wary could be related to looking. —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
I suppose we will never know for sure, though the COED's entry sounds convincing. I had checked the OED, but there were lots of entries for "leer," and I must have missed that one. | |||
|