Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
<Proofreader> |
Did I just become aware of it, or do TV reporters now more often than not preface a statement with "So, the police (etc.)...? | ||
|
Member |
So... "No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson. | |||
|
<Proofreader> |
A nice discussion but their info is a bit confusing. It's Episode #7 but that is actually #70 on the list. Took a while to find. | ||
|
Member |
"So" takes me back to my college days. https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/...200/#isbn=0918286387 Didn't I grouse about "so" on here some while ago? I don't know how to do a search. | |||
|
<Proofreader> |
BobHale may not want to see this since it features his least favorite speaker, a man who generates significant wind power ihrough gesticulation. | ||
|
Member |
He discusses battery sizes, but fails to mention why we English speakers have taken to calling a voltaic cell a battery. "Battery" implies two or more of something. Once upon a time we DID say "cell," but no more. So... why? What a revolting development, I say. We also used to call them "accumulators," which is still the German term. In French it's "pile," presumably because a small one resembles a French hemorrhoid. ![]() | |||
|
Member |
Did we?
| |||
|
Member |
Yep. I remember hearing people say, D cell or C cell or A cell. Several cells in series formed a battery. | |||
|
Member |
I thought you meant that we used to say “battery cell” instead of “battery”, but you meant something else. I don’t think “battery” implies two or more of something. I don’t see why the fact that we can discuss batteries without mentioning their internal composition is to be regretted.This message has been edited. Last edited by: goofy, | |||
|
Member |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_cell See paragraph two. When/how/why did "cell" imply just one? | |||
|
Member |
Just one what?
The source for this is the M-W entry for “battery”. But I dont see how M-W provides evidence that “a battery properly consists of multiple cells.” Whether or not a battery “properly consists of multiple cells” is an electical argument, not a linguistic one. I know nothing about electronics. Or, maybe it’s about specialized electronic vocabulary where “battery” means something different than it does in standard English.This message has been edited. Last edited by: goofy, | |||
|
<Proofreader> |
A battery is a collection of cells. The more cells, the higher the voltage. That's why electric cars need such heavy batteries, to get the necessary volts. | ||
|
Member |
A battery can consist of one cell, apparently. I’m not sure what the problem is, if there is one.This message has been edited. Last edited by: goofy, | |||
|
Member |
Oh, well, it's just cranky old me spouting off. Too many years of reading James J. Kilpatrick. ![]() | |||
|
Member |
We talked about it here, too. | |||
|