Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Most of us consider the latter as only a snooty use of the former. However, "Utilize" oft implies being put to repeated use, esp for some unaccustomed purpose: Owing to the superior quality of its lead, that very brand and model of wooden pencil was subsequently utilized on our production line as a means for lubricating a certain hard-to-reach bearing To me, "used" wouldn't quite fit there. However, when I discussed this with Laverne, she disagreed, indicating that the former would do just as well; and since she's much smarter than I, I'm wondering if I might be wrong | ||
|
Member |
[American Heritage Book of English Usage section 294.] I've noticed that there seems to be few true synonyms. They may start out that way, but many seem to begin to subtly differ over time in meaning. I'll take a look-see at my other usage manuals. A related question might be: Are the three nouns use, usage, and utilization different in meaning or necessary? —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
Um...just try to use the word "use" in academia (at least in the U.S.); it immediately gets changed to "utilize." I do agree with you, Zmj, that there really aren't many true synonyms when you really look at the meanings of words carefully. The problem often is that people don't carefully consider the use of words. To be honest, I had always thought that "utilize" and "use" were synonyms, but I can see the point. I would think that "use" and "usage" are true synonyms, but that "utilization" would be similar to the American Heritage's description of "utilize." | |||
|
Member |
I don't see that use and usage are the same. For me usage is the way that something is used, while use is simply the fact that it was used. Example. I question the use of "use" in this sentence. I question the usage of "use" in this sentence. In the former I think I am questioning that you have used it at all, in the latter I am suggesting that you have used it wrongly. "No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson. | |||
|
Member |
I feel a difference among -- NOT between, cuz > 2! -- these words. Examples: "<blabla> is improper usage, and thus its use should be discouraged." See if swapping those 2 doesn't feel 'off': "<blabla> is improper use, and thus its usage should be discouraged." And of course: "<blabla> is improper utilization ..." just won't fly at all. "We are devising workable utilization criteria for <blabla>." I dunno; maybe "usage" would work here as well. David | |||
|
Member |
There's also another use of use as a auxiliary verb: e.g., I used to read many a book, but not *I utilized to read many a book. Not even an academic would write or say the latter. (Note: I did not say that the three nouns were the same, I asked if they were. For me all three are quite distinct.) [fixing typos to reduce stress]This message has been edited. Last edited by: zmježd, —Ceci n'est pas un seing. | |||
|
Member |
Yes, the utilized to read is the most apparent one, Zmj. The rest, I am not sure of. Bob's example of "use" in a sentence and "usage" in a sentence is interesting. I agree that I wouldn't necessarily say, "The usage of the verb in this sentence is wrong." Yet, could I? Maybe it's just what we get used to (not utilized to!). For example, most people say "Nonsense!" when something is nonsensical. Yet, they could very easily say "Balderdash!" We just don't use "balderdash" so much and therefore aren't accustomed to it. | |||
|
Member |
Kalleh, yes I'm sure you could If you wanted to sound snooty | |||
|