Though perhaps I should have heard of Simpson's Paradox before, I haven't. I was introduced to it today when reviewing some research findings. I read some online sites about it (including the Wikipedia article), but here's my question: Wikipedia said that "Simpson's Paradox disappears when any causal relations are derived systematically – i.e. through formal analysis." Is anyone here familiar with the concept? If so, is that statement about it disappearing with formal analysis true?
I hadn't heard of this by name. but I was aware of the problems involved in interpretation when combining two sets of data without making allowance for group sizes, etc.
Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
I thought it had to do with the unlikely success of Homer, Bart, Marge, et. al.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti