Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
ramrodded Login/Join
 
<Proofreader>
posted October 18, 2012 12:10
Avoidi g the political aspects of his actions, Paul Ryan entered a soup kitchen one night with a camera crew who filmed his washing what some said were clean dishes. The kitchen's director complained that Ryan hadn't been invited but "ramrodded" his way in past a volunteer.

The term was picked up by the media, none of whom seemed uncomfortable using it. However, I think the proper and more accurate term was "steamrollered". Any (non-political) judgments?
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 18, 2012 14:19Hide Post
Both words imply using a good deal of force. I think ramrodded is probably the better of the two words to use here, since it doesn't imply as much force as steamrolled. Either word, I think, is probably an exaggeration; I doubt that any great force was used. Perhaps "pushed his way in past a volunteer" would have been a better choice of words, though not as sensationalized.
 
Posts: 2879 | Location: Shoreline, WA, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 18, 2012 17:40Hide Post
I've always thought of "ramrodded" as vigorously leading a group, or stirring it to action, and not necessarily with evil intent.


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted October 19, 2012 04:38Hide Post
Wordnik gives two definitions of ramrod used as a verb: "To exert strict control over; supervise closely." and "To force passage or acceptance of: a group that ramrodded the bill through Congress." Neither of those definitions fits the context.

I'm with Proof: "steamrollered" would be better.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 19, 2012 14:32Hide Post
Wordnik also gives three definitions of steamroller used as a verb:
quote:
v. To smooth or level (a road) with a steamroller.
v. To overwhelm or suppress ruthlessly; crush.
v. To move or proceed with overwhelming or crushing force.

None of those definitions fits either. That's why I suggested a less forceful verb be used, such as pushed, shoved, or even forced.
 
Posts: 2879 | Location: Shoreline, WA, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BobHale
posted October 20, 2012 22:45Hide Post
I'd've gone with forced. I agree with tinman that "steamrollered" doesn't quite fit but I don't feel that "ramrodded" does either.


"No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money." Samuel Johnson.
 
Posts: 9423 | Location: EnglandReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 21, 2012 04:59Hide Post
Why not, "shoved his way in past a volunteer?" Forget steamrollers and ramrods, cheeky, thoughtless pushiness is what it is.


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted October 21, 2012 20:25Hide Post
Yet, we all know what was meant, correct?
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 21, 2012 21:22Hide Post
Yes, we all knew that he forced himself in, but we really don't know how much force was used. I doubt a lot of force was used, which ramrodded implies. I suspect the reporter chose that word to sensationalize it. We do love to exaggerate and sensationalize things.
 
Posts: 2879 | Location: Shoreline, WA, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted October 22, 2012 20:34Hide Post
I think, however, this discussion is similar to one in the times smaller thread. As in that thread, you know what is meant, so why the big deal?
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of zmježd
posted October 23, 2012 02:51Hide Post
How about bullied his way in?


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
 
Posts: 5149 | Location: R'lyehReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 23, 2012 04:40Hide Post
"Bullied" implies threat; he was probably not threatening, just thoughtless, IMHO.


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted October 23, 2012 06:21
quote:
I suspect the reporter chose that word to sensationalize it.

That was the quote from the kitchen's director, as reported. I think ramrodded has the implication of authority over another, which the crew did not have. Rather than bullied, perhaps bulled?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Proofreader>, October 23, 2012 12:39
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted October 23, 2012 10:13Hide Post
"Bullied" implies threatening to me, Geoff.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 23, 2012 11:55Hide Post
Reread my post, Kalleh; we agree.


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted October 23, 2012 20:35Hide Post
Ah...sorry about that. I do think "bullying" implies a threat, though not everyone does. "Ramrodding" is a direct threat.
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted October 24, 2012 09:16Hide Post
Depends on the receptivity of the ewe the ram is rodding, no? Roll Eyes


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6187 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12