Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Nope Login/Join
 
Member
posted
Is "no" shorter than "nope?" Yep.

Do people therefore prefer the shorter form? Nope.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/quo...h_no_is_shorter.html


RJA
 
Posts: 488 | Location: Westport CTReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Well, damn. From now on I'll just say nyet


It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. -J. Krishnamurti
 
Posts: 6168 | Location: Muncie, IndianaReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Heh. Ok, but really no need to go off-shore...


RJA
 
Posts: 488 | Location: Westport CTReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Kalleh
posted Hide Post
I do like this point:
quote:
More generally, it's likely incorrect to presume that language has an explicit drive toward being easier. Rather, there are tangible forces at play that result in it generally being easier, but not always (e.g., nope).
 
Posts: 24735 | Location: Chicago, USAReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Caterwauller
posted Hide Post
"Easier" language certainly isn't the goal with Cockney Rhyming Slang. Nor is it the point with Pig Latin or with many rap/urban slang terms. In this last case, as far as I can tell (and I've never made a study other than anecdotal) the culture of Hip Hop and it's correlating language structure is consistently an effort to be "cool" and creative beyond the "norm".


*******
"Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.
~Dalai Lama
 
Posts: 5149 | Location: Columbus, OhioReply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arnie
posted Hide Post
Is nope really an exact synonym to no? Maybe the intention is to add some finality to the pronouncement; as the author says, the addition of the plosive finishes the word off nicely.


Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
Posts: 10940 | Location: LondonReply With QuoteReport This Post
<Proofreader>
posted
Nuts.
 
Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of zmježd
posted Hide Post
Finally, an article about a language feature in a main-stream medium written by a linguist. @arnie: he does write about the syntactic context in which nope is used (i.e., by itself) and that it is emphatic and final.

I also, like how he just offered some possible explanations and ignored the usual deprecations that accompanies an article about language change. Refreshing.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
 
Posts: 5148 | Location: R'lyehReply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright © 2002-12