If the name of someone becomes an adjective (e.g. freudian, thatcherite) - should that adjective be capitalised (e.g. Freudian, Thatcherite)? Furthermore, do they have any specific name?
Originally posted by mutualdesire: If the name of someone becomes an adjective (e.g. freudian, thatcherite) - should that adjective be capitalised (e.g. Freudian, Thatcherite)?
In mathematics removal of the capital is a high honour, not accorded to all eponyms: Hermite is commemorated in the Hermitian, Jacobi in the Jacobian, Hamilton gets the Hamiltonian path; but euclidean space, boolean algebra, cartesian coordinates.
Thanks a lot! I find it fascinating that pasteurize has been decapitalised, but English muffins haven't... it seems like more than just time goes into the equation.
I find it fascinating that pasteurize has been decapitalised, but English muffins haven't
I wouldn't consider that the expression "English muffins" was eponymous, any more than, say, China tea or Scotch Whisky. It is a description of a type of muffin (almost unknown in England, incidentally) and not an eponym.
I consider that an eponym is a new word created from a name associated with the thing the word describes. Pasteurise we have heard and there are many others including boycott, that have now become normal words and have lost their capital.
Richard English
Posts: 8038 | Location: Partridge Green, West Sussex, UK
It is a description of a type of muffin (almost unknown in England, incidentally) and not an eponym.
I know we've talked about this before, but I just don't get why it's called "English muffin" then.
Have french fries just been around a lot longer than Swiss cheese? Is that why the former isn't capitalized, but the latter is? Oh...and I think, if I recall, France doesn't have french fries, just as England doesn't have English muffins.